Why does desmond see the future

However, from Desmond's point of view it does not really matter; he knows that every future he sees is a possible version of what is going to happen. From what he can see, Desmond knows, however, that some aspects of the future are fixed. Charlie is irrevocably fated to drown on the Island. As long as Charlie is completely focused on staying alive, he can postpone his death, but that occupies all his efforts.

Desmond knows that Charlie is not going to keep this up indefinitely, and in the meantime, Charlie is not useful. So Desmond tells Charlie what Charlie needs to hear, that Charlie has the chance to save the two people he loves most by sacrificing himself. Desmond was probably not lying outright; he probably did see a possible future in which Claire and Aaron escape, but he knows that that was not the only possible future.

Desmond just did not emphasize to Charlie that things might not turn out that way, because that would not be the most effective way of raising Charlie's morale. Sign up to join this community.

The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. Create a free Team What is Teams? Learn more. Did Desmond intentionally lie to Charlie? Ask Question. Asked 2 years, 10 months ago. When Sayid saw the vision himself however, he told her he believed her and they told each other that they loved each other.

Can desmond see the future lost? Who killed Sayid's wife? Does anyone survive in Lost? What is the monster in Lost? Is Jacob from Lost God? Why is Desmond special in Lost? Does Penny find Desmond? Why does Desmond push the button? How often did they push the button on Lost? What was the point of the hatch in Lost? Is the Lost island purgatory? Is Jacob bad in Lost? What is the point of Lost? Why was Charlie killed off Lost?

Does Sawyer survive in Lost? Do they ever get found in Lost? Is Sayid dead? What did Widmore whisper to Locke? Do Shannon and Sayid get together? More appropriate for another article. Illogical or previously disproven. Proven by canon source, and moved to main article. Speculative and lacking any evidence to support arguments. Responding to another theory use discussion page instead. This does not include responses that can stand alone as its own theory.

Usage of an indented bullet does not imply the statement is a response. Categories TheoryTab articles. Universal Conquest Wiki. Main Article.