When a key was struck, a linkage would swing the bar into a tape coated with ink. When the character struck the tape, the impression of the character was transferred onto the paper, which was positioned behind the tape.
Sholes' original prototypes had a problem with the bars colliding with each other and jamming. So the story goes that he arranged the keys with the most common letters in hard to reach spots, to slow typists down and try to avoid this problem. Whatever the reason for the QWERTY layout, it seems pretty unlikely that one of the first keyboard layouts invented would be perfect. The Dvorak keyboard layout tries to minimize the distance traveled by the fingers.
It also tries to make the typist alternate hands on consecutive letters as often as possible. The fate of the keyboard was decided in when the five largest typewriter manufacturers —Remington, Caligraph, Yost, Densmore, and Smith-Premier— merged to form the Union Typewriter Company and agreed to adopt QWERTY as the de facto standard that we know and love today.
Typists who learned on their proprietary system would have to stay loyal to the brand, so companies that wanted to hire trained typists had to stock their desks with Remington typewriters. In a paper, the researchers tracked the evolution of the typewriter keyboard alongside a record of its early professional users. They conclude that the mechanics of the typewriter did not influence the keyboard design.
Early adopters and beta-testers included telegraph operators who needed to quickly transcribe messages. However, the operators found the alphabetical arrangement to be confusing and inefficient for translating morse code. The Kyoto paper suggests that the typewriter keyboard evolved over several years as a direct result of input provided by these telegraph operators. For example;. Thus S ought to be placed near by both Z and E on the keyboard for Morse receivers to type them quickly by the same reason C ought to be placed near by IE.
But, in fact, C was more often confused with S. In this scenario, the typist came before the keyboard. The Kyoto paper also cites the Morse lineage to further debunk the theory that Sholes wanted to protect his machine from jamming by rearranged the keys with the specific intent to slow down typists:.
If Sholes really arranged the keyboard to slow down the operator, the operator became unable to catch up the Morse sender. He went through several design iterations, attempting to bring the typewriter to market. Remington made several adjustments, and launched the Sholes and Glidden typewriter on July 1, Remington also swapped the R and. The 0 was added fairly early on, but some keyboards well into the s were still missing a 1. The updated Remington 2 typewriter, introduced in , changed this.
Sholes and Densmore went to Remington, the arms manufacturer, to have their machines mass-produced. In , the first Type-Writer appeared on the market. No contemporary account complains about the illogical keyboard. In fact, few contemporary accounts even mention the machine at all. At its debut, it was largely ignored. Sales of the typewriter did not take off until after Remington's second model was introduced in , offering the only major modification to the keyboard as we know it today.
The first machines typed only capital letters. The new Remington No. It is called a shift because it actually caused the carriage to shift in position for printing either of two letters on each typebar. Modern electronic machines no longer shift mechanically when the shift key is pressed, but its name remains the same. In the decades following the original Remington, many alternative keyboards came and went. Then, in , with funds from the Carnegie Foundation, Professor August Dvorak, of Washington State University, set out to develop the ultimate typewriter keyboard once and for all.
Dvorak went beyond Blickensderfer in arranging his letters according to frequency. With the vowels on one side and consonants on the other, a rough typing rhythm would be established as each hand would tend to alternate. With the Dvorak keyboard, a typist can type about of the English language's most common words without ever leaving the home row. The Dvorak keyboard sounds very good. It appears that many of the studies used to test the effectiveness of Dvorak were flawed. Many were conducted by the good professor himself, creating a conflict of interest question, since he had a financial interest in the venture.
General Services Administration study of appears to have been more objective. It found that it really didn't matter what keyboard you used. Good typists type fast, bad typists don't. It's not surprising, then, that Dvorak has failed to take hold.
No one wants to take the time and trouble to learn a new keyboard, especially if it isn't convincingly superior to the old. A few computer programs and special-order daisy wheels are available to transform modern typewriters or word processors to the Dvorak keyboard, but the demand for these products is small. Word processors increase that speed significantly. The gains that Dvorak claims to offer aren't really needed. One design has large buttons with the common letters grouped around the space button in the centre.
Microwriters have just a few keys and rely on the pattern in which they are pressed to produce letters. The computer keyboard is a direct copy of the typewriter keyboard, so why is the typewriter keyboard arranged in a non-alphebetical order?
The answer is so when they typewriters were first introduced they could easily be demonstrated to show how timesaving the device would be by having sales representatives quickly type out the word "typewriter" as all of these letters are found to be on the top row.
0コメント